<- Resources
Inside the EvidenceResearchersUpdated June 1, 2026

Whole Genome Sequencing Isn't the Right Tool for Every Question

Whole genome sequencing is powerful, but identity workflows need the right level of data for the question being asked.

Whole genome sequencing can answer deep research questions, including reference assembly and broad variant discovery. That does not mean every cultivar identity workflow needs that level of sequencing.

For routine identity comparison, the better tool is the one that is repeatable, cost-aware, and aligned to the decision being made. A focused marker approach can be more practical for comparing many submitted samples.

Match the tool to the job

  • Use broad sequencing when the question requires broad discovery.
  • Use repeatable marker panels when the question is identity comparison.
  • Keep methodology consistent across samples.
  • Do not confuse more data with a clearer answer.
Related Articles

Keep reading

Inside the EvidenceCultivators

PCA Shows Genetic Neighborhoods, Not the Whole Story

PCA is a readable map of genetic structure. It is useful, but it should be read alongside pairwise similarity and branch views.

Read article ->
Inside the EvidenceCultivators

Somatic Mutations Don't Break Genetic Fingerprinting

Somatic mutations exist, but they do not automatically undermine marker-based cultivar identity workflows.

Read article ->
Apply the evidence

Start with the sample record.

Order Samples ->Contact