Questions, answered.

Cannabis cultivar names are often disconnected from documented genetic records. The same name can be used for different plants, and the same plant can circulate under different names. True Cut anchors cultivar identity to genetic data instead of naming alone.

Cultivar verification is the process of checking whether submitted plant material matches an expected genetic identity record or comparison context. It combines sample metadata, DNA marker data, and careful interpretation.

The workflow starts with a documented sample, generates genome-wide marker data, compares the resulting profile against submitted or reference records, and reports whether samples match, differ, or sit near one another genetically.

For each paid sample, the core deliverables are genetic analysis, a report or dossier describing the identity profile, a True Cut record for the submitted cultivar, and documentation that can support verification, licensing, or further review.

The current order flow is priced at $399 per sample. Breeders can add more than one sample before checkout, and the order total is calculated from the number of samples.

Timing is confirmed during intake after the required sample workflow, lab capacity, and analysis scope are accepted. The breeder account tracks the order through payment, sample fulfillment, lab processing, and Forensic Identity Dossier delivery.

The account order flow collects brand name, operator name, phone, business address, optional license number, and grow type. The logged-in account email is used instead of asking for a second email address during checkout.

Yes. The order flow supports multiple samples in one checkout. Each sample keeps its own cultivar metadata while sharing the same breeder profile, shipping destination, and payment.

Genetic fingerprinting identifies organisms using patterns of genetic markers across the genome. In cannabis, SNP markers can create a multilocus profile that distinguishes one genotype from another.

SNP stands for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism. These are positions in the genome where one DNA base can vary between individuals. By analyzing many SNPs together, scientists can create a stable genetic profile for each plant.

SNP fingerprinting uses a pattern of many SNP markers as an identity profile. One marker is not enough; the useful evidence comes from comparing the full pattern across many positions.

Whole genome sequencing reads far more data than identity verification usually requires. SNP-based methods focus on informative markers distributed across the genome, which is a practical way to compare identity and relatedness.

SNP fingerprinting is widely used across agricultural and horticultural crops to identify cultivars, track relationships, and detect mislabeled plant material. True Cut applies that established class of methods to cannabis cultivar identity.

Cultivar identity is the genetic identity that distinguishes a plant from other cultivars. In cannabis, identity has often been based on names and reputation rather than documented genetic records.

Yes. Multiple genetically distinct plants can circulate under the same cultivar name when naming is informal or historical documentation is incomplete.

Yes. In cannabis, the same strain or cultivar name can be reused by different operators, inherited through incomplete records, or attached to different plant material over time.

Yes. Clonal propagation can allow genetically identical plants to move through the market under different names if labels change during distribution.

Clones from the same source plant are expected to be genetically indistinguishable across the markers used for identity comparison. Handling errors, mislabeled material, or rare mutations can still create questions that need review.

Genetic analysis can show whether plants are identical or related. It cannot, by itself, determine historical authorship or which name should apply. Naming claims require historical documentation in addition to genetic data.

No. True Cut focuses on identity genetics: whether plants are identical, different, or related. Trait prediction, breeding optimization, and marker-assisted selection are different uses of genetics.

Genotype is the underlying genetic profile. Phenotype is what the plant expresses, including visible traits, chemistry, aroma, and performance. Environment and cultivation can affect phenotype even when genotype stays stable.

No. Complex hybrid ancestry can make exact pedigree reconstruction difficult, but genome-wide marker analysis can still detect relatedness, genetic structure, and identity differences.

No. Marketing or breeding terminology does not change the DNA profile being measured. The genetic fingerprint is based on marker data, not the label applied to a cross.

Cannabinoid expression can shift with light, nutrients, plant age, harvest timing, and processing. Two genetically identical plants may produce different chemical profiles under different conditions.

Terpene production is also influenced by environment and cultivation practices. Terpene data is useful, but it is not a stable substitute for genetic identity.

Yes. Different genotypes can produce similar terpene or cannabinoid profiles through shared biochemical pathways or similar cultivation conditions.

Chemistry can vary with environment, harvest timing, plant age, sampling, drying, processing, and lab method. Genetic identity can stay the same while cannabinoid or terpene results change.

Somatic mutations can occur during clonal propagation in many plant species. Most small changes do not alter the overall genetic identity profile measured across many markers.

Phenotypic drift is a practical term growers use when plants appear or perform differently over time. Many drift concerns are environmental, handling, disease, or process issues rather than a change in the core genetic fingerprint.

Tissue culture can preserve and reproduce plant material under controlled conditions when the workflow is managed carefully. It supports clean propagation, but identity should still be documented and verified when the cultivar record matters.

Genetic fingerprinting relies on many markers across the genome. A small number of mutations at individual loci does not usually erase the broader identity signal.

Forensic cannabis genetics means using genetic evidence, sample records, and documented methods to answer identity questions in a reviewable way. The genetic data supports the record; legal use still depends on contracts, counsel, and the forum involved.

No. True Cut documents genetic identity and relationships. Breeders and growers retain control over their genetics and breeding programs.

No. Genetic documentation does not create legal ownership. It can provide identity evidence that may support contracts, licensing, or legal review, but ownership rights depend on the applicable legal framework.

Breeders usually need a combination of records, contracts, licensing terms, source documentation, and qualified legal advice. Genetic identity evidence can strengthen that documentation, but it is not a substitute for a legal strategy.